However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On April 29, 2017, the Defendant damaged the property by reporting the amount of DK5 car, which is owned by C, the victim C, parked at the same place, and making the string line of the said vehicle known to the opposite direction by drinking on several occasions without any justifiable reason while under the influence of alcohol, at the front side of the YY-gu, Ansan-si, Ansan-si, Ansan-si, Sinsan-si, Seoul, on April 29, 2017.

2. 공무집행 방해 피고인은 같은 날 22:50 경 안산시 상록 구 E 앞길에서, ‘ 남자가 술에 취하여 차량을 때려 부수고 있다’ 는 112 신고를 접수하고 현장에 출동한 경찰관이 자신에게 인적 사항과 차량을 파손한 이유에 대해 물어보는 것에 격분하여 “ 야 개새끼, 니 미 좆같은 새끼, 술 먹고 깼다.

It is time for the police because of drinking.

The sum of this subsection shall be discarded.

Neina

들 밖에서 걸리면 죽여 버려. ”라고 욕설을 하며 오른손으로 안산 상록 경찰서 F 파출소 소속 경찰관 G의 오른팔을 1회 내리치고 계속하여 오른발로 왼쪽 허벅지를 1회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by police officers on 112 report processing.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Each written statement C, H and I;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), and the choice of imprisonment, respectively, for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act for the suspended sentence (the conditions favorable to the reasons for sentencing), where the degree of violence, intimidation, deceptive scheme, or interference with official duties is minor, the second crime (damage) [the scope of recommending punishment] is general standard in the following cases: (a) the scope of recommending punishment / [the scope of obstructing the performance of official duties] the scope of obstructing the performance of official duties; (b) the mitigation area (one month to eight months); (c) the mitigation area (one month to eight months); and (d) the extent of obstructing the performance of official duties.