2. The judgment of the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects the depth thereof; the total amount of damage is not more than KRW 5 million; the defendant's health condition is not good; the defendant [2013 senior group5327] remitted the amount of damage to the victim D, G, H, I, K, and L; however, the defendant committed a repeated crime against multiple victims for a long time; the defendant committed the crime of this case on April 2012; the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year on January 5, 2013; the defendant committed the crime of this case on January 5, 2013 without being aware of the fact that there was a history of criminal punishment for a suspended sentence of one year; the defendant still failed to recover significant damage despite the above repayment; the defendant did not change the defendant's circumstances after the sentence of damage; the defendant did not change the defendant's circumstances or circumstances that could be considered in light of the circumstances and records of the crime of this case; and the defendant's circumstances and changes in the circumstances after the sentence of this case; and the records.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.