1. At around 20:20 on April 3, 2013, the injured Defendant: (a) took a drunk from the “Escker” operated by the victim D (the age of 70) who was under the influence of alcohol and took part in the clothes; and (b) took part in the panty met, the Defendant: (c) took the victim’s chest into the said abscoper; (d) took part in the panty only; (c) taken part in the victim’s chest, the victim’s hair was pushed by the victim’s feet hand to prevent the victim from entering; and (d) took part in the victim’s hair at the entrance of the victim’s hair.

As a result, the defendant suffered from the injury that the victim could not know the number of days of treatment.

2. The Defendant committed assaulting the police officer F on two occasions, such as the date and time set forth in Paragraph (1) of this Article, and at the same place, that the f, who was called out upon the report that the f, carried the f, carried the right shoulder of F with the left shoulder of the horse, twice again, when the F, carried the right shoulder of F with the left shoulder, and one time, respectively.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on crime prevention.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol to D and F

1. Relevant Article 257(1) and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;