When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On April 6, 2019, at around 20:35, the Defendant committed assault, such as: (a) ascertaining the circumstances of the case by the Busan Police Station C District, where a male was dispatched after receiving a report from 112, “influences women inside the car; (b) and (c) wanting to present an identification card to verify personal information; and (d) wishing to “I am her age, her age, her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officials on the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement of each police statement of E and D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to 112 reported case processing lists and CCTV-cape photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for the ordinary concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse (when suspension of execution of a sentence of imprisonment is invalidated or revoked);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the grounds for the suspended sentence)

1. The sentencing criteria are not applicable since the defendant is selected to apply the sentencing criteria.2. On the other hand, the sentencing criteria are not applied in light of the following: (a) the defendant who made a decision of sentencing has led to his confession of all the crimes and has repented his mistake in depth; (b) the defendant has received a letter from police officers; (c) the defendant has no criminal power; and (d) the defendant's age