beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.09.29 2016나2013886

소유권이전등기

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The defendant's grounds for appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the argument in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified even if the evidence submitted to the court of first instance was presented to this court.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is as follows, and the defendant's additional assertion is accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for the following "3. Additional determination" as to the defendant's additional assertion:

2. The amended part of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning “project company” in the 3th 14th 14th 14th shall be regarded as “Defendant Intervenor.”

The third 16th 16th 16th son in the judgment of the first 1st son shall be considered as “Plaintiff”.

The 4th 7th 7th tier of the judgment of the first instance shall be "the construction" to "the plaintiff."

The defendant's assistant intervenor's "the defendant's assistant intervenor" in the fourth 8-9 of the judgment of the first instance shall be deemed to be "the plaintiff's".

The second additional agreement was made to the effect that the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s assistant intervenor may conclude the fourth land sales contract in two sequences on December 29, 2010, and the fourth land sales contract was concluded on September 30, 201, respectively.

The 8th 11th 11th am the “project from the project company” shall be “from the Defendant’s Intervenor.”

The "Corporation" in the 8th 18th 190s in the judgment of the first instance shall be changed to "Plaintiff".

The "Corporation" in the 8th 19th 19th 10 judgment shall be changed to "Plaintiff".

The defendant's 8th 26th 26th son in the first instance judgment is called "the defendant's assistant intervenor".

The "Corporation" of the 11th 5th eth eth of the judgment of the first instance shall be regarded as the "Plaintiff".

The 11th to 7th of the judgment of the first instance is the "receiving".

The 13th page of the first instance judgment “2014Gahap50408” is deemed to be “2014Gahap50408 (principal lawsuit), 579464 (Counterclaim).”

The 13th judgment of the court of first instance is held 20.