도로법위반
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. Violation of the restriction on the temporary operation of cargo drivers belonging to the summary order (the Jeonju District Court) subject to the summary order subject to the review of the charges of this case: (a) a violation of the restriction on the operation of cargo drivers at the time and location of the cargo drivers belonging to the summary order of the charges of this case; (b) A B B B B B B B B B B 20059 on April 13, 2005, Nov. 21, 2004; (c) a violation of the restriction on the restriction on the operation of Austria-do 2005 altitude6589 A B B B B 2059 on July 19, 205 on July 19, 2005;
2. The former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005) Article 86, which is a joint penal provision, among the applicable provisions of each of the facts charged in the instant case, lost its effect retroactively by the Constitutional Court Decision 2010Hun-Ga14, 15, 21, 27, 35, 38, 44, 70 of Oct. 28, 2010.
Thus, since each of the facts charged in this case constitutes a case that does not constitute a crime, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.