The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant charges on the grounds indicated in its reasoning.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and the evidence duly admitted, the part of the robbery did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules.

Examining various circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records, such as the Defendant’s age and behavior environment, relationship with victims, motive, means and consequence of each of the instant crimes, and circumstances after the crime, the lower court cannot be deemed extremely unfair to sentence the Defendant’s life imprisonment even when considering the circumstances asserted in the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.