Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

The defendant is a motor vehicle dealer, who is the representative of ‘D' in the net time C complex.

A motor vehicle dealer shall not notify a person who inspects the performance and condition of a motor vehicle by fraud of the details of the inspection of the performance and condition of the structure, devices, etc. of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, on February 21, 2017, the Defendant notified the buyer F of the record of the performance and condition inspection prepared in a false manner with respect to E vehicles.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police officer in relation to G;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. A written accusation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the ledger of inspection of performance and condition of motor vehicles, and the ledger of motor vehicle registration;

1. Article 80 of the relevant Act and Articles 80 subparagraph 7 and 58 (1) of the Automobile Management Act concerning criminal facts, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;