However, the Defendants are above two years from the date of this judgment.

Defendant

A The representative of corporation C and Defendant B are the chief director of corporation C.

The Defendants and the employees D of the above companies prepared documents as if they suspended business for some of the employees of the above companies and attempted to obtain the subsidies for business suspension allowances from the Republic of Korea.

Accordingly, on August 12, 2016, the above D suspended business for 18 employees from July 1, 2016 to July 31, 2016, and paid a shutdown allowance to the above employees. Accordingly, the above D submitted an application for a subsidy for maintenance of employment (suspension of business) to the public official in charge of the Ansan Employment Welfare Center, which is located within the territory of the Manan-gu, 303 at the Mayang-gu, Mayang-gu, Mayang-gu, Mayang-gu, Mayang-gu, Ma-gu, 303.

However, in order to avoid the crackdown, the Defendants had 18 employees of C Co., Ltd. work in other places than C Co., Ltd., and did not suspend the business of those employees.

As above, the Defendants deceptioned a public official in charge of name in the above manner and received KRW 10,985,790 in the name of subsidies for employment maintenance from the victim in the name of C Co., Ltd. on August 22, 2016, and received KRW 100,049,950 in total from August 22, 2016 to November 8, 2017 by the same method as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Table.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired with D and acquired a total of KRW 100,049,950 from the Republic of Korea.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. Each police statement made to E, F, and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on entry and departure transactions;

1. The Defendants of the relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 347(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act; Articles 347(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act; the choice of imprisonment

1. Article 37 (former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the Defendants’ violation of the principle of suspended execution) (Article 62(1)).