2. The crime of this case is deemed to have been committed by the Defendant, using the identity of the reporter at the Internet newspaper, as if the Defendant were to report an article unfavorable to business to the victims, who are managers of the construction company, and thus, the method of crime was extremely poor. The crime of this case was committed in several construction sites from October 2013 to January 2014, and the victim was nine. Furthermore, the Defendant again committed the crime of this case even if he was punished for a suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor and a fine for two times more than 2010, and the crime of this case was committed by the Defendant, taking into account the following factors: the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the crime of this case was committed against the victims, and all of the victims and family members were agreed and supported.

Even if the lower court’s punishment is unreasonable, it cannot be deemed that the sentence is unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.