However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant in violation of the Special Act on the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who is engaged in driving a shower car.

At around 13:20 on November 22, 2014, the Defendant proceeded with a road front of the German household, which is located in the Grand-dong of Busan Metropolitan City, from the fluort-do, to the fluort-do Blue-do.

At the time, since the front side of the defendant was a stop in order to circumvent the front line, there was a duty of care to prevent the accident in advance by accurately manipulating the front line and the left and right of the driver of the motor vehicle and accurately operating the steering system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and found that vehicles are parked on the front side of the vehicle due to the negligence of driving while under the influence of alcohol and stopped. The Defendant was faced with a part of the vehicle behind the vehicle in front of the Defendant’s vehicle, which is driven by the victim D(W, 33 years old) who is under the influence of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the victim F (the 33 years of age), who was the passenger of the affected vehicle, the salts of the bones of the verte, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment to the victim D due to such occupational negligence, from approximately two weeks of disease.

2. On September 20, 2006, the Defendant received a summary order of a fine of one million won as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Daegu District Court on September 20, 2006, and a fine of two million won as a fine in the same court on January 31, 2013.

The Defendant driven a shower car with approximately 140 meters alcohol concentration of about 0.066% in the section of about 140 meters from the Do in front of the parking lot of the Buddhist church located in the Bupyeong-dong in the Gyeongsan-si of the time stated in paragraph (1) to the front road of the Cho Dong-dong in the same Dong.

After all, the Defendant, who violated the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice, driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol again.

Summary of Evidence

1...