However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Crimes against victims C;

A. On September 2012, around 02:00 on September 2012, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s business by force for about 15 minutes, such as her refusal, and her desire to take a large interest to customers, at around 02:0, the main point of “E” operated by Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D Victim C (the age of 37). However, the Defendant demanded the rest of other customers who drink alcoholic beverages. However, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s business by force.

B. On October 16, 2012, around October 16, 2012, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s business by force of about 10 minutes, such as demanding the rest to other customers who drink alcoholic beverages at the above main point, but refusing to demand the rest. However, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s business by force of about 10 minutes, such as demanding the rest of customers who drink alcoholic beverages.

2. Crimes against victim F;

A. On October 27, 2012, around 14:00 on October 27, 2012, the fraud Defendant: (a) by “H restaurant” operated by the Victim F (56 years of age) located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G; (b) by deceiving the victim as if he had no intent or ability to pay the price by ordering alcohol and food; and (c) by deceiving the victim as if he had such intent or capacity, and by deceiving the victim, he/she was provided with food equivalent to KRW 10,00,000, such as 100,000

B. On October 27, 2012, the Defendant continued to interfere with the business under the foregoing paragraph (a) on October 27, 2012, which interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force for about 20 minutes, such as the victim’s demand to change the amount of food at the above H restaurant, and the victim’s desire was boomed, and the victim was boomed on the front road.

C. On October 29, 2012, around 05:00 on October 29, 2012, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force on the ground that: (a) the Defendant, at the said H restaurant, said H restaurant, the Defendant: (b) stated that, without the consent of the victim or his employees, the Defendant would not take the Plaintiff’s disease in the cooling house, and that, (c) I, an employee, would drink the alcohol without permission; and (d) said I would take a large amount of bath to the said I; and (c) said I would have interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force for about 10 minutes.

3...