수용보상금 청구의 소
1. The Defendant’s KRW 40,167,240 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from September 10, 2016 to October 4, 2016.
1. Details of ruling;
(a) Business approval and public notice - Business name: B Housing redevelopment and rearrangement project (hereinafter “instant project”) - Project implementer: Defendant - Public notice of project implementation authorization: Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government public notice on December 5, 2012
B. Decision on expropriation made on July 22, 2016 by the local Land Tribunal of Seoul Special Metropolitan City: The date of expropriation: Land and obstacles listed in attached Table 1 owned by the plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as "land in this case" and the land and obstacles in this case are aggregate buildings; hereinafter referred to as "compensation amount"): Compensation amount as stated in attached Table 1 attached hereto 1: An appraisal corporation: - An appraisal appraisal corporation, a stock company, the Korea Appraisal Board (hereinafter referred to as "Expropriations," and the result of appraisal of expropriation; hereinafter referred to as "the result of appraisal of expropriation"): The fact that there is no dispute over the result of the appraisal of expropriation / [based] fact that there is no dispute, entry in land and obstacles listed in attached Table 1 owned by the plaintiff (including each number), each of the land in attached Table 1, and the purport of the entire pleadings.
2. The assertion and judgment
A. The compensation should be calculated according to the court's appraisal result with respect to the Plaintiff's alleged land and obstacles, so the Defendant shall pay the difference between the appraisal result and the Plaintiff.
(b)as shown in Appendix 2 of the relevant statute.
C. 1) The instant land is located within the instant project zone located in the E-middle School and the S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-
(b).