2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff is a company established with cargo transportation business as its purpose business.

B. From January 25, 201 to February 3, 2012, as indicated in the list of the 2-vehicle scrapping, the Plaintiff: (a) took over and registered a strawing vehicle which is a special purpose truck from a limited liability company, daily traffic, etc. (Attached Nos. 2, 1, 2) or a cleaning vehicle (Attached Nos. 2, 3, and 12) over 12 occasions; (b) registered the strawing vehicle as a cleaning vehicle; and (c) registered the strawing vehicle as a cleaning vehicle; and (d) registered the strawing vehicle or the strawing vehicle with the strawing vehicle that was taken over as above (hereinafter “the st wing wing wing wing”).

(hereinafter referred to as the "vehicle prior to the scrapping of a car" in the attached Table 2 list shall be as follows: each vehicle stated in the "vehicle prior to the scrapping of a car in this case".

On September 29, 2014, the head of Seoul Metropolitan City north-gu Office changed the registration of the Plaintiff into a general or special-purpose truck with restriction on the supply of each vehicle before the car-type truck, which is a special-purpose truck that is allowed to be supplied through the scrapping of the car, but this is not subject to the report of change because it is not subject to the report of change, and thus, it is not subject to the permission of change, and thus, it violates the main sentence of Article 3 (3) of the former Trucking Transport Business Act (amended by Act No. 13382, Jun. 22, 2015; hereinafter referred to as the "former Trucking Transport Business Act") on the ground that the Plaintiff violated the main sentence of Article 19 (1) 2 of the former Trucking Transport Business Act and Article 3 (1) 5 (1) of the former Enforcement Decree of the Trucking Transport Business Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 26251, May 26, 2015; hereinafter referred to as the "former Enforcement Decree").