If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On August 25, 2013, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol of 0.062% of blood alcohol concentration at around 00:30, the Defendant driven D-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-C-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiry into the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Relevant legal provisions and the choice of punishment for a crime: Articles 148-2 (2) 3 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act; Selection of a fine;

1. Attraction of a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Provisional payment order: A sentence shall be determined as ordered by considering all the following circumstances as the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act: A favorable normal circumstance: recognition of and reflects on the facts of crime, and the degree of blood alcohol concentration is not high and the distance of drinking driving is short: A person again commits the instant crime even though he/she was punished by a fine for the same kind of crime in the latest (e.g., May 21, 2013): It is determined as ordered by the disposition for the reasons above, such as his/her occupation and criminal record relationship.