2. The costs of the lawsuit, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

A. On April 1, 2005, the Plaintiff was newly appointed as a full-time lecturer at C University Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation (hereinafter “instant appointment”) affiliated with the Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter “ Intervenor”), and on May 1, 2006, the Plaintiff served as C University Social Welfare Department assistant professor.

B. On August 14, 2012, the Intervenor revoked the appointment of the instant case on the ground that “the Plaintiff had falsely stated the academic background at the time of the appointment of the instant case.”

(hereinafter referred to as “instant revocation of appointment”). C.

On September 14, 2012, the Plaintiff filed a petition review with the Defendant seeking revocation of appointment. On December 10, 2012, the Defendant dismissed the Plaintiff’s petition review.

(hereinafter “Examination and Decision of this case”). [Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1-1, 2, Eul evidence 6, 25, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the review and decision of this case is legitimate

A. 1) The plaintiff's assertion 1) The Lao University in the United States, the plaintiff's assertion, (hereinafter "the Lao University").

In order to obtain a master's degree, ① submit a report along with the 30 credits after obtaining a master's degree, or ② obtain a 24 credits and submit a master's degree thesis. The Plaintiff was unable to complete the preparation of a master's degree thesis after obtaining 30 credits. The Plaintiff is the U.S. TEX (hereinafter referred to as the "TTEX")

In this paper, the plaintiff was admitted to enter doctoral degree courses, and the tex university recognized that the plaintiff obtained credits from the tex university as the academic achievement equivalent to master's degree acquisition and allowed the plaintiff to enter the courses.

Accordingly, the Plaintiff, at the time of the appointment of the instant case, stated the “degree” and the “degree” column in the master’s degree column at the time of the appointment of the Plaintiff. As such, the Plaintiff intentionally did not submit false documents related to the Intervenor’s academic achievement or that he/she did not submit false documents. The Intervenor’s examiners at the Tex University.