However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Interference with business;

A. The Defendant from the end of August 2014 to the same year

9. Until the beginning, she entered the “Ecafeteria” restaurant operated by the victim D(S) in the original city in the state of alcohol and drinked alcoholic beverages at the same time, she interfered with the restaurant business operated by the victim for about 20 minutes by force by force by allowing other customers in the said restaurant to leave the restaurant by her flusium with a large amount of sound, her flusium, her flusium, a flusium, and a flusium in the said restaurant.

B. The Defendant from the end of August 2014 to the same year

9. Until the beginning, while under the influence of alcohol, the victim entered the “Ecafeteria” for the operation of the victim set forth in the above paragraph (a) and interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force by avoiding disturbance at the victim’s place, such as: (a) the victim was breading the victim with the warning that “I will not have any satisfy; and (b) the victim’s “I will not have any satfy” and “I will have any satfy with any satfy”.

C. On September 28, 2014, around 10:20 on September 28, 2014, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force for about four hours from the said date to about 14:20 hours from the said date, on the following grounds: (a) the Defendant: (b) laid down waste on a small wave in the “H cafeteria”; (c) laid down on the road; (d) made it difficult for customers to find the vehicle parking on the said “H cafeteria”); and (e) made the said restaurant customers parked a vehicle difficult; and (e) made them go back without entering the said restaurant; and (e) obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force.

2. Injury;

A. On September 17, 2014, the Defendant: (a) at around 00:20 on September 17, 2014, set aside in front of the “J restaurant.”