대여금
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment asserted that the plaintiff lent KRW 53 million to the defendant via the plaintiff, C or D.
According to the statement No. 1-1-8 of the evidence No. 1-2 of this case, it is insufficient to recognize that the plaintiff lent KRW 53 million to the defendant's father, and that the plaintiff lent KRW 53 million to the defendant's father by himself or through C, and D, but the loan certificate was not prepared between the plaintiff and the defendant, and the plaintiff himself was also demanded to lend the above money for the purpose of operating the company, and the representative of the company claims to the effect that the defendant was able to pay the above money as a matter of course. In full view of the above facts, the above facts alone are insufficient to recognize that the plaintiff lent KRW 53 million to the defendant's father, and there is no other evidence to support this.
The plaintiff's above assertion cannot be accepted.
2. The plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed on the ground that it is without merit.