The judgment below

Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court and the lower court, it is justifiable to have determined that the lower court convicted the Defendant of the primary facts charged out of the modified facts charged on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

In so doing, contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on workers, persons related to them, and the specification of facts charged

In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in the case where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment with or without prison labor for not less than ten years is imposed, an appeal may be filed on the grounds of unfair sentencing. As such, in this case where a fine is imposed against Defendant B, the argument that the determination of punishment against Defendant B is unfair is not a legitimate ground for appeal

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.