However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. A special intimidation: (a) around October 22, 2017, the Defendant: (b) 19:40, at the D main points operated by the Victim C (M, 43 years old); (c) who, under the influence of alcohol, took an act to bread with the beer and bed with a dangerous object without any justifiable reason; and (d) committed an act to get the victim to get the victim from death.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

2. On October 22, 2017, from around 19:40 to around 20:20, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s main business by force by threatening the victim C as set forth in paragraph 1 at the aforementioned D main points, causing threat to the victim C, causing sound, taking a bath, and preventing other customers from receiving.

3. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the same time and place as Paragraph 2, and at the same time and place as Paragraph 2, sent out by the police officer assistant F of the E police box affiliated with the police officer, and the police officer G asked questions about the personal information of the Defendant and the circumstances of the case, etc., of the above police officers, sent a bath to the said police officer, and collected beer soldiers on the tables at the seat of the police officer, and served him on the police officer.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 report handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A written statement of F and G;

1. Investigation report (ctv);

1. A report on investigation (special intimidation, etc.), photograph;

1. 112 Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the table of reported case settlement;

1. Articles 284, 283(1) (a) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314(1) (a) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) (a) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime (a point of obstructing the performance of official duties);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes Act (the punishment imposed on a person who interferes with the performance of public duties by mutual consent and by obstructing the performance of public duties by mutual consent and by obstructing the performance of public duties by mutual consent and by mutual consent among persons who are more severe);

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is the same.