아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(강제추행)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for four years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
around 04:40 on May 30, 2017, the Defendant, “2018 Gohap115,” referred to the C apartment D, the residence of the Defendant located in the Jeonju-gun B, Jeonju-gun, and the Defendant, “Is 17 years old at that time,” and rejected the Defendant’s refusal to do so.
그럼에도 피고인은 한손으로 쭈그려 앉아 있는 피해자를 끌어당긴 후 양손으로 강제로 피해자를 껴안아 거실바닥에 눕혔고, 이에 피해자가 빠져나가려고 하자 피해자를 빠져나가지 못하게 상체를 껴안은 양손에 강하게 힘을 주고 한쪽 다리를 피해자 다리 위에 올려놓아 약 10분 정도 피해자를 움직이지 못하게 하였다.
Accordingly, the defendant committed an indecent act against the victim who is a child or juvenile.
"2019 Highly 191"
1. Violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. against Victims F (Joint Bribery) Defendant and G conspired with the victim to take money from the victim by taking advantage of the fact that the victim F, who was a victim of the juvenile reformatory located in Gwangju, was able to take money from the victim first to frightly, and on January 16, 2019, G, “I have an item to take money from the victim with a thief covered with a thief in the vicinity.” The Defendant f, who was the victim f, who was fright back to the trophe of Go-ju, was hying the victim’s horses, and f, was frightened with a thief by taking advantage of the fact that G joined the thief’s violence in Gwangju region, and was willing to take money from the victim by taking advantage of the fact that he took part in the violence.
The Defendant and G, according to the above conspiracy, from January 16, 2019 to 22:00 on the same day from January 16, 2019 to 22:00 on the same day, the Defendant called the victim to the effect that “the Defendant was drinking by a flatner.” As seen in the previous week, the Defendant and G called the victim to the effect that “the Defendant was a cruel or a cruel defect in length” and, at the same time, called the victim’s k5 vehicles in the Defendant’s operation in front of the Hong-jin-gu Seoul Metropolitan City I, the victim was aboard and the victim was on the part of the previous efficien-