When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On November 18, 2014, around 00:45, the Defendant 200 to 200:45, and 200 to 200 to 200 to 200 to 200 to 200 to 30 to 200 to 30 to 206.

Therefore, police officers D and E, who belong to the small police station C district unit, were dispatched to the site after receiving 112 reports, and confirmed the identity and residence of the defendant, but the defendant was born to the back seat of the patrol vehicle that the defendant could not return home under the influence of alcohol and moved to the residence of the defendant.

The Defendant, while moving as above, expressed the above police officers’ desire to read “a Chewing shot,” and brush the blocking strings installed inside the patrol vehicle by drinking and sprinking the strings, added the hand to the sprinks of the blocking strings, and obstructed the police officers’ legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the 112 Report Report Case by cutting down the strings of the above D while driving the said patrol vehicle, and assaulting the strings by cutting down the strings of the above D while driving the said patrol vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report, the C District Office Work Site and the Blue video-facing to the extent that the statutes are met;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Consideration, such as the fact that the defendant confessions the defendant with the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the fact that the defendant does not have the same criminal record, and that the defendant seems to have reached an contingent crime under the influence of alcohol, etc.