Where the defendant does not pay the above fine, one day shall be 10.

1. Around 22:00 on May 17, 2020, the Defendant threatened the victim by sending the victim “(s) who was aware of the fact that the victim had to move his/her motor vehicle to the victim C by telephone, but was refused to do so.” However, the Defendant sent the victim(s) to the Kakakao Stockholm message, “I would like to take off the victim’s motor vehicle to the victim’s vehicle. However, the Defendant threatened the victim(s) by sending the victim(s) “I would like to prepare to do so without knowledge of the world, Mata, Ma, D, and Crum.”

2. At around 23:30 on May 17, 2020, the Defendant made a public insult to the victim on the ground that at the same place as the preceding paragraph, at around 23:30 on May 17, 202, the Defendant made a public insult of the victim by stating that “the victim was not subject to his own apology, she must spawned, spath, n, and n.e., police officer F of the E box and hining manager H, etc. who was reported and dispatched to the scene 112 as the issues of the preceding paragraph.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Attachment of Intimidation messages) to each written statement prepared by the police with respect to the defendant C’s legal statement

1. Relevant Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of a fine for a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;