If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of B-ro taxi.

On July 21, 2012, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on July 21, 2012, and led the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government distribution-45 road to proceed in the direction of distribution in the direction of distribution distance.

Since there is an intersection where signal lights are installed, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to see well the right and the right and the right of the motor vehicle and to drive the motor vehicle safely in accordance with good faith.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and caused the collision to the right side of the vehicle operated by the victim C (Nam, 58 years old) who passed the intersection from the right side to the left side of the intersection by the negligence of passing through the intersection in violation of the signal.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim C, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence as above, and injury to the victim E (V, 23 years of age) boarding the Defendant’s vehicle, which requires approximately four weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Accident vehicles and on-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act or more;