1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, the lower court’s determination that the Defendant was guilty of violating the farmland law among the facts charged in the instant case on the grounds stated in its reasoning is justifiable. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of free e

2. Examining the reasoning of the judgment of the court below in light of the records, it is just to reverse the judgment of the court of first instance which found the prosecutor guilty of the charges of this case on the grounds that there is no proof of crime, and to find the defendant not guilty. Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by violating the law of logic and experience and exceeding the bounds of

On the other hand, although the prosecutor appealed to the entire judgment of the court below, the prosecutor did not state specific reasons in the petition of appeal as to the conviction and did not state the reasons for appeal.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.