However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 21, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (such as issuance of false tax invoices) at the Seoul Western District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on April 1, 2017.

On February 2, 2012, the Defendant, as the actual operator of D Co., Ltd. with the heat C 17 Dong C 325 of Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, requested the victim E to enter the office of director in the name of D in order to operate the electronic equipment wholesale business in the Yongsan Electronic Commercial Building, and had the victim E registered E as the director of D without the consent of E, and had the victim registered E as the representative director.

1. Forging a private document;

A. On May 25, 2012, the Defendant prepared a letter of apology of the temporary general meeting of shareholders, which is a document necessary for registering the change of the representative director, in the office of a certified judicial scrivener G office located in Jung-gu Seoul, Seoul, Seoul, with the effect that “In-house director H who is the representative director at the office of the headquarters of the company headquarters 09:00 on May 23, 2012 and E accepts the appointment of the representative director” and was in possession of it in advance.

The seals of E are affixed to the name next to that of E.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a copy of a copy of a temporary general meeting of shareholders in E, a private document related to fact-finding.

B. The defendant shall accept the appointment of the representative director on May 23, 2012, because he was appointed as the temporary general meeting of shareholders on the above date, at the above place, as the documents required for the registration of change of the representative director.

May 23, 2012 stated “E” and held in advance.

E’s seal imprint was affixed next to his name.

Accordingly, the defendant has forged a letter of acceptance of the representative director in E, a private document related to fact-finding for the purpose of uttering.

(c)

The defendant has a certified judicial scrivener G who is aware of such fact at the above time and place. D.