A. 1) The Plaintiff is a Chinese company that manufactures and sells a gold metal metal shop. 2) The Defendant A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) is a company whose manufacturing purpose is the manufacturing industry, etc., of steel garments.

Defendant B is a person registered as an internal director of the Defendant Company, and Defendant C is a person who actually operates the Defendant Company.

B. On July 9, 2013, the Plaintiff: (a) loaded the scrap metal of 31.09 tons on or around July 12, 2013; (b) 25 tons on or around November 12, 2013; (c) 50 tons on or around November 29, 2013; and (d) exported to the Defendant Company after shipping it at the Chinese New River; (b) the Defendant Company received delivery of the said scrap metal at the Busan Port; (c) around that time, the Defendant Company received delivery of the said scrap metal at the Busan Port; and (d) on November 13, 2013, among the scrap metal companies listed in subparagraph (b) of the said paragraph, paid KRW 18,250 U.S. dollars on or around November 12, 2013 and USD 730 x 25 tons on the scrap metal company (hereinafter the same shall apply).

each entry, the purport of the whole pleading

2. Determination as to the claim for the payment of goods to the defendant company

A. According to the above facts of recognition as to the cause of the claim, barring any special circumstance, the defendant company is obligated to pay the remainder of the goods price and damages for delay, excluding the amount that the plaintiff was paid to the plaintiff ($ 18,250 above).

The plaintiff and the defendant stated that the unit price of the gold metal per year is different from each other, and that this is the following:

We examine the paragraph.

B. As to the argument of the Defendant Company, the Defendant Company asserts that the amount paid to the Plaintiff as the purchase fund for the new type machinery (a machine discovered by increasing the number of ironworks) and the amount treated as scrap metal due to the defect in robbery among the steel companies supplied, should be deducted from the Plaintiff’s claim amount.

First of all, the amount paid by the defendant as the purchase fund of new line machinery by the plaintiff.