However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 30, 2017, the Defendant was under drinking on the C-way in Bupyeong-si B around 02:45, the Defendant used drinking alcohol.

“Along with the report of 112, the Plaintiff’s sloping E (42) belonging to the Busan High Police Station D District District E (3) of the Busan High Police Station, and the Defendant’s sloping e, such as the defect of the Defendant’s returning home, the e, “the flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick.”

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the above slope E and interfered with the police officer's legitimate execution of duties on the 112 Report Processing and Main Protective Measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the treatment of damaged photographs, 112 reported case;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of the recommended sentence] There is no person [the person subject to a special sentencing] in the basic area (6 months to 1 year and 6 months) [the person subject to a special sentencing] [the decision subject to a sentence] under the circumstances unfavorable to the Defendant’s assaulting the police in the course of performing his/her official duties, such as the fact that the Defendant is the first offender, the fact that the Defendant is the first offender, the fact that the degree of assault is relatively minor, and the degree of assault is relatively minor, and the same sentence as the order is determined by taking account of various sentencing conditions as shown in the argument of the instant case.