beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.05.11 2017고정1267

정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)등

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is a person who uses “C” as “E” and uses “E” in B carpets D.

A. On November 26, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc. (Defamation) did not have committed a personal attack, such as misappropriation, terrorism and attack against the Defendant’s family pictures from G, and even though the court did not have received any insufficient evidence, the Defendant did not know that he/she violated the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, etc. (Defamation).

D. The Vice Minister of Audit and Inspection shall read one minute of D. C. C. Kafa, and I shall Doz.

The G name account in the place presumed to be one company shall be terrorist to the G of Title A and his family members without any connection, and the personal character shall be more severe.

‘ 라는 허위사실의 글을 작성하였고, 계속하여 같은 날 13:05 경 위 게시 글의 댓 글 란에 ’ 제가 법원에서도 말씀 드렷죠 사 과하시라고 증거 불충분으로 다행히 풀려나셔서 좋앗겟지만요‘ 라는 허위 사실의 글을 작성하였다.

Accordingly, the Defendant, by means of information and communications networks, destroyed the reputation of the victim by disclosing false information openly.

B. Interference with the business of the victim by spreading false facts, such as Paragraph A., thereby hindering the victim’s business.

2. According to the records of this case, the following facts are recognized:

A. On the trade name of “H”, there was a dispute between J and Defendant that sells mainly water-processed goods through the Internet site, etc., and the Defendant, etc., for a long time. At the time, J used “L (L: A. M)” for “L” and “N (N)” for G sites.

B. The above J filed a complaint against the Defendant in 2015 as a crime of defamation under the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc., but the Defendant was rendered a final judgment of non-guilty measures against the Defendant around February 2016.