However, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for a period of one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Defendants are two or more duals.

1. Defendant B

A. On April 25, 2020, around 16:00 on April 25, 2020, the Defendant demanded that 100,000 won should be changed to the victim on the ground that the victim brought about the visibility of the Defendant for about 50 years prior to the 50-year visibility at the place of residence of the victim A, Kunsan-si, Masan-si,

The defect, which caused the damage to the victim by bating the batfage of the victim, and assaulting the victim by bating the head of the bat.

B. Around 21:00 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) returned to the victim’s residence; (b) but the victim did not open the door; (c) as a dangerous object, which was installed in the front corridor of the victim’s residence, brought in the victim’s front corridor in advance, the Defendant damaged the victim’s property so that approximately KRW 330,000 of the repair cost would be 330,000 won.

2. Defendant A, at the same time and place as the above-mentioned No. 1-A, set up an assault as set forth in the above-mentioned No. 1-A(A), Defendant A, by hand, sustained the victim’s hair by taking the victim’s head, leakage of the victim’s hair by hack (1.5kg) which is a dangerous object on the floor of the victim’s head, and sustained the victim’s shoulder and arms by hand and hack, thereby causing injury to the victim, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of the defendant B, the legal statement of the defendant A in part, and the witness A's legal statement

1. The defendant A and his defense counsel's assertion as to the defendant A and his defense counsel's each film investigation report on the damaged parts of the repair diagnosis report, the repair receipt's photo, and each image investigation report on the damaged parts (related to attaching photographs to the ASEAN) of the defendant A and their defense counsel mentioned in the judgment, the defendant A and their defense counsel have several descriptions of the defendant B in accordance with the decision of the court below in order to defend the infringement of the legal interests of the defendant A as the defendant A suffered violence from the defendant B at the time and place stated in the facts of crime in the judgment.