beta
(영문) 대구고등법원 2019.07.18 2019나20482

공사대금

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court has used for this case are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal or addition of the pertinent parts as follows, and thus, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Each witness shall be deemed to be a witness of the first instance court; “Appraiser” to be “an appraiser of the first instance court”; “this case’s appraisal report” to be “an appraiser of the first instance court’s judgment” to be “an appraiser of the first instance court’s judgment”; and “an appraiser of the first instance court’s judgment” to be “an appraiser of the 14th instance court’s judgment.” On the 13th day of the 14th day of the first instance court’s judgment, “B” to be “I and H’s testimony” to be “I and H’s testimony” to be “I and the 30,37,40, and 40 through 444, and the 15th day of the first instance court’s judgment to be signed and sealed by the Plaintiff at the time of the construction contract, and both the Plaintiff and the Defendant were attached to the construction contract, and the facts attached thereto were not disputed between the parties, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion to the effect that the instant construction contract was not incorporated into the Defendant.”

However, in full view of the statements No. 1-5, the testimony of the witness G of the first instance trial, and the witness H of the first instance trial, the Plaintiff and the Defendant entered into the instant construction contract, together with the instant detailed confirmation, and the said detailed confirmation.