When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On April 18, 2015, around 22:30 on April 18, 2015, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as a spathal of a patha, etc. requiring approximately four weeks of treatment on the face of the victim when the victim D (the age of 41) was spawn from the face of the bus he drives, etc., against the victim's face of the bus he drives.

(1) The Defendant asserted that the Defendant’s act against the victim is merely a passive defensive act, and thus constitutes self-defense or legitimate act. However, according to the evidence duly examined and adopted by the court, the Defendant’s exercise of force against the victim does not constitute a simple defensive act to defend an unjust attack, but can be recognized that the Defendant had the nature of an attack. Thus, the above assertion cannot be accepted)

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. Application of each general medical certificate (D) statute;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

2. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the confinement of a workhouse.

3. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.