2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer of the National Health Insurance that provides citizens with insurance benefits for the prevention, diagnosis, medical treatment, and rehabilitation of diseases and injury, for childbirth and death, and for the improvement of health pursuant to the National Health Insurance Act. B is the insured of the National Health Insurance Act. The Defendant is a mutual-aider who takes over the liability for damages to be borne by C for a third party due to an accident caused by the operation of the bus belonging to C, and D is a bus engineer working in C.

B. On July 21, 2017, B around 08:53, F University bus stops located in Bupyeongcheon-si, D was boarding a G bus belonging to C (hereinafter “instant bus”). D started driving the instant bus before B was seated.

C. B, on July 22, 2017, was diagnosed by the Plaintiff’s medical care institution, as “the name of disease: Madern base and tension, Madern base and tension, Madern base and tension, and other parts of salt, tensions, and tensions: The future treatment opinion on July 21, 2017: from the diagnosis date to October 19, 2017, it is deemed that a stable price is required within two weeks from the diagnosis date.” From July 22, 2017 to the above hospital, the Plaintiff was treated at the above hospital. The Plaintiff entered the total medical expenses incurred during the above period 815,210 won less the Defendant’s charge 201,620 won from the Corporation’s charge 201,210 won less the Defendant’s charge 201,570 won, or the amount calculated by subtracting the Defendant’s charge 613,613,606, or 4701.

B paid to the above hospital, etc.

D On October 19, 2017, the Incheon District Public Prosecutor's Office was subject to a disposition to have no authority to prosecute the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) due to the rapid departure of the instant bus from the Incheon District Public Prosecutor's Office.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 4, 5, 7, and 9, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion D is in this case before he neglected his duty of care for the safety of passengers, etc. and sits in B's seat.