절도
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
1. On July 15, 2018, from around 04:14 to around 04:16 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) discovered the victim D who was divingd from the stairs located in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul; (b) confirmed that there was no person around it; and (c) confirmed that there was no person around it, the Defendant carried out a total of KRW 1,410,00,00,000, including a cellphone (opphoneS8 Plus) with the market value of KRW 90,000,000,000,000,000 won, and cash 1,000,000,000 won.
Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.
2. There is a cell phone image which taken the suspect's interrogation protocol against the defendant, the defendant's statement, and CCTV reproduction screen as evidence of the defendant's theft of property like the above facts charged.
The protocol of interrogation of the accused and the written statement of the accused are prepared at the time of interrogation of the prosecutor or the preparation of the written statement by the accused.
The mobile phone image on which the CCTV reproduction screen was taken is a mobile phone image not a video that was taken at the scene of the crime, but a video that was installed at the scene of the crime by reproducing the CCTV image as a CCTV device, and it is merely a mobile phone that controlled a specific page out of the play screen.
The video does not contain a figure that the defendant stealss the cell phone of the victim.
Such evidence alone is insufficient to recognize the facts charged, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.
3. In conclusion, the above facts charged constitute a case where there is no proof of crime and thus, a verdict of innocence under the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act
In accordance with Article 58 (2) of the Criminal Act, a summary of judgment shall be publicly announced.