상해
The judgment of the court below is reversed.
The sentence against the accused shall be 500,000 won.
Defendant. A fine.
1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant, while punishing the Victim F and vagabonds, did not pluck or pluck up the Victim’s fingers, the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine, thereby finding the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case.
2. Determination:
A. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted by the determination of facts or misapprehension of legal principles regarding the assertion of mistake of facts, the following facts can be recognized.
The victim F, while drinking alcohol at the main point of E-mail, f.m., f., f., f., f., f., drinking alcohol to the main main point, and f., f., f., f., f., f., and f., f., f., f., f., f., b
Defendant
The Happiness and the victim's day-to-day day-day day-to-day day-day day-to-day day-day day-to-day day-day day-day day-to-day day-day day-day day-day day-to-day day-day day-day day-day day-day day-day day-day day-day day (hereinafter
The injured party stated that the owner of the drinking house speaks both in the middle and both of them, and that the injured party's left hand was plicked by the hand of the accused, and that the injured party was plucked and plucked, and that the voice of the plar bank was passed.
After the fighting is authentic, the victim was plucked by plucking or plucking up to collect evidence, and the victim was placed in the police team and was immediately subject to emergency measures from the 119 first responder in the police team, and was treated at the hospital immediately following the 112 report.
In such a situation, among persons who are at the same time, the victim was in a situation in which he/she was sealed, sealed, and was making efforts with one another on his/her hand, and immediately after the fighting, the victim was actually receiving medical treatment due to the injury to his/her grandchild, and it does not seem that the victim is particularly making a false statement about the current situation or the circumstances of the injury.
Therefore, the defendant and the victim are working for the same order.