However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2012. 4. 22. 07:30경 부산시 동래구 B에 있는 동래경찰서 C지구대 내에서, 민원인 안내데스크 책상 컴퓨터로 현행범으로 체포된 피고인의 일행 D의 수사서류 작성 업무중인 경사 E에게 “이 씨발 개새끼야, 니 죽어봐라, 니 새끼들 다 죽인다, 아 진짜 개자슥이네, E아 끝까지 함 가자, 너거 딸래미 보지를 쑤셔뿐다, 야 이씨발놈아, 내 니 끝까지 갈봐 줄게, 졸라게 귀찮을 꺼다”라고 욕설과 협박을 하면서 경사 E을 향해 침을 뱉었다.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the handling of flagrant offenders and preparation of investigation documents, which are legitimate performance of duties in slope E by assault and intimidation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E;

1. Application of statutes to a work status list and field map;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 10 (2) and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of mental disorders;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the same Act on the grounds that the defendant was in a state of mental or physical disability due to excessive drinking,

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 or more of the Criminal Act;