2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Even if the Defendant is not a tenant B, the Defendant conspiredd to engage in the conduct of an authorized intermediary C and lessee.

1. On May 15, 2014, the Defendant forged B’s private document lease contract in the column of “the site for a real estate lease contract [the location: D, 1918 of the Busan Metropolitan City, and the deposit: hereinafter “Deposit: etc.”) at his/her own discretion without the prior consent of the victim B at an officially authorized brokerage office located in Suwon-gu, Busan, and 102 E, which is a private document related to the rights and obligations of B, with the seal affixed to B of the contract indicated as “G, telephone: H and name B” and forged B, which is a private document related to the rights and obligations of B.

2. The Defendant exercised the said investigation document by delivering the forged real estate lease agreement to I who is unaware of the circumstances at the above time and at the above place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police to J;

1. Application of statutes on a copy of each real estate lease agreement;

1. Article 231 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 234 and Article 231 of the Criminal Act;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;