2. Even when considering the facts that the Defendant led to the confession and reflect of the instant crime, and that there is a family member to support the Defendant, the Defendant has been punished five times due to driving without a license in the past (the Defendant has not obtained a driving license only once). In particular, the Defendant repeated the instant crime even when he was punished by a fine by committing the same kind of crime during the period of repeated offense due to the crime of violating the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, in full view of all other circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable. Thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.