If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

1. On April 1, 201, the Defendant forged private document: (a) indicated “C” in the location column of the real estate lease contract printed in the carter located in “C” located in the Namyang-si, Namyang-si, Gyeonggi-do; (b) “66,200” in the land category column; (c) “66,200,000” in the deposit column; and (d) indicated “F million,000” in the remainder column; (c) “F,” “F,” “H,” “F,” and “H” in the resident registration number column of the lessor’s address column; and (d) affix the above H seal attached thereto.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged one copy of the real estate lease agreement in the name of H, a private document on rights and obligations.

2. On April 1, 2011, the Defendant: (a) delivered one copy of the forged real estate lease contract to the employees of the tax office having no knowledge of the forgery as if it were a document that was duly formed; (b) around April 1, 201, the Defendant used the forged real estate lease contract as mentioned above in the Namyang-si, Seoyang-si, Dong-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the monthly rent contract for real estate (five pages) and the lease contract for real estate (34 pages of investigation records);

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, the choice of punishment, and Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act (the occupation of exercising a falsified investigation document and the selection of fines);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;