Examining the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court and the first instance court, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that the facts charged in the instant case was guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

There is no violation of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules without exhausting all necessary deliberations.

In addition, the argument that the judgment of the court below erred in the misapprehension of legal principles is not a legitimate ground for appeal, as it is alleged in the ground of appeal that the defendant did not consider it as the ground for appeal or ex officio.

Furthermore, even if examining the judgment below, there is no error of law by misunderstanding the legal principles as alleged.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.