2. The judgment of larceny is an offense established when larceny steals another person’s property with the intent to use and dispose of another person’s property, such as his/her own property, in accordance with the economic usage.

However, the following circumstances are acknowledged based on the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court.

① On August 10, 2014, the Defendant used a cash withdrawal machine for the Scambon, at around 15:00, on Sundays. In order to find a handphone, the Defendant and the Defendant visited the said place at around 18:18 on the same day, and found the instant wave, which was owned by E, by the Defendant.

② At the time, the above pathization had four bankbooks and shots, other valuables did not contain and no details were available to identify the owner’s contact address.

③ The Defendant, at home, placed the foregoing marry on the instant table, and did not use the content.

④ On August 19, 2014, at the time when a police officer visited the Defendant’s house, the Defendant recognized the fact that he brought about spawn, and returned the fact to the Defendant’s house.

⑤ With respect to the circumstances in which the Defendant was in possession of a spawn in an investigative agency, the Defendant brought about a spawn to the manager of the agricultural cooperative following the following day of Sundays, and her husband, “whether he/she would have a spawn if he/she had a spawn with a spawn as a spawn,” and her swn the swnhn with the horses.