Where the above fine is not paid, 100,000 won shall be one day.

around 03:51 on May 14, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was demanded by the victim E (20 k, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, and knife) to force the Defendant to commit an indecent act; and (b) was flifeed by the victim’s knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, and knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, and knife, knife the victim’s knife, and knife the victim’s knife.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Legal statement of E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Attachment of a written diagnosis of injury to a victim);

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

2. Selection of an alternative fine (a fine shall be punished by taking into account the following facts, such as the failure to reach an agreement with the victim and failure to recover from damage, but the degree of injury is not serious, circumstances of the crime, and in particular, the defendant's charge of forced indecent conduct by the defendant, which was the basis of the instant case, is not recognized as having no evidence of crime:

3. Article 70 (1) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

4. Reasons for innocence under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act in the order of provisional payment;

1. On May 14, 2017, the Defendant: (a) committed an indecent act by force against the victim in a manner that: (b) the victim’s left turt turbane located in Busan, Busan, on the part of May 14, 2017; (c) the Defendant placed the D club going beyond the direction to the rear of E (20 e (n) in front of the toilet; and (d) the victim’s left turt turb

2. In a judgment of conviction in a criminal trial, the conviction should be based on evidence of probative value, which leads to a judge to have a conviction that is beyond a reasonable doubt, to the extent that the facts charged are true. Therefore, in a case where the prosecutor’s proof fails to sufficiently reach the extent that such conviction may be led, even if there are suspicions of guilt.