beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.04.10 2014고단653

도로법위반

Text

The defendant is innocent.

Reasons

1. A’s violation of the restriction on vehicle operation on December 21, 1998, which is an employee of the defendant specified in the facts charged, around 10:46;

2. Since the penal provisions applied to a summary order subject to review have retroactively lost effect according to the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality, the Defendant is acquitted in accordance with the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.