A. On September 10, 2017, the Plaintiff received an operation to cut a reciting connected to a reciting reciting, which was conducted by a medical corporation C (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant hospital”) at a hospital operated by a medical corporation C (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant hospital”). On September 12, 201, the Plaintiff received an operation to remove a reciting by cutting a reciting reciting connected with a reciting reciting reciting, using the reciting lag.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant operation”). B.

The Plaintiff’s blood test result carried out following the instant surgery was much more referring to AST 452 (ST 7-38IU/L) and AL 407 (Modden 4-43 IU/L).

On the other hand, after the instant surgery, the Plaintiff constantly complained of the uniforms, etc., and removed the exhaust pipe of the department of the operation on September 15, 2017, the Plaintiff also observed the sapap chex color.

C. After that, as the Plaintiff’s appeal for pain continued, the medical personnel at Defendant Hospital inspected CT on September 16, 2017 in front of the CT inspection, which was scheduled as of September 18, 2017, and conducted an inspection to the effect that “the Secretary has not increased, and there are multiple occasions in the mouth.”

On the other hand, the doctors of the film department expressed their opinions that the harm to the general public is doubtful because the general public is not well traced by the general public on the same day.

Even after CT inspection, the medical professionals of the Defendant Hospital inserted the internal diameter of the ERCP (inception scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopics

On September 20, 2017, the Plaintiff continuously complained of the pain pain, etc., and transferred to the F Hospital on September 20, 2017. On the following day, the Plaintiff received Loenna-factory coloning the end of the fence and the warden on September 21, 201, and at the time of the operation, the Plaintiff’s abandonment was damaged.