2. The judgment is based on the following facts: (a) the Defendant’s mistake is against the Defendant; (b) the Defendant’s damage was partially recovered through a securities company where the Defendant was working; (c) although the amount of damage caused by the instant crime is large, the Defendant did not make any effort to recover damage; (d) the Defendant’s minor punishment was sought; (e) there was no particular circumstantial relationship or change of circumstances that the Defendant would reduce the above punishment in the trial; and (e) there was no other special circumstance or change of circumstances that the Defendant would have to reduce the above punishment in the trial; and (e) the Defendant’s age, character, character, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances before and after the commission of the crime, the sentencing of the lower court is too unreasonable. Thus,

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.