However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is the user of a private-use truck with C2.5 ton, and the Defendant is the first person operating an article transport company with the trade name of “E”.

On June 18, 2015, at the request of the head of the E-site site on the name of 14:20 on June 18, 2015, the Defendant loaded an article on the said truck at the implied Dong, Jung-gu, Seoul, and transported it to the Furway of Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, and received transportation cost of KRW 40,000 from the head

On July 17, 2015, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of the Trucking Transport Business Act with respect to the instant case at the Seoul Northern District Court (Seoul Northern District Court) and filed an application for formal trial on July 28, 2015.

On the other hand, the defendant D did not know whether the defendant paid the cost of transportation to the defendant on the non-name site.

On December 16, 2015, from around 13:00 to 14:00 on December 16, 2015 to around 14:00, the Defendant testified to Defendant D to conceal the fact that he/she received transportation expenses from the corridor in front of the Seoul Northern District Court No. 202, Seoul Northern District Court No. 202 (Dobong-dong) located in Dobong-gu, Seoul, Seoul.

There is no problem to the correspondence.

Whether the court paid money to the court

, if any, the notice was not given.

The phrase “a request to answer”, and the D made it possible for them to make a false testimony.