When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 05:40 on June 3, 2020, the Defendant: (a) extracted 7 waivers of the market price equivalent to KRW 1,400 in the upper corner of “Dju” operated by the victim C in the Gyeonggi-si-si, Gyeonggi-do; (b) the Defendant extracted 1,400 won of the market price that the victim raised.

Accordingly, the Defendant stolen the property owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of C’s on-site photographs receipt statutes;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the Defendant was sentenced to a fine before the instant crime was committed, and that the Defendant committed the instant crime while being under criminal trial for the same kind of crime, etc. is disadvantageous.

However, there are favorable circumstances such as the Defendant’s confession of the instant crime, the fact that the damaged goods were returned to the victim, and the amount of damage is very minor. In full view of these circumstances, various sentencing conditions, including the Defendant’s age, family relationship, environment, and circumstances after the commission of the instant crime, and the above sentencing guidelines shall be determined as ordered.