2. The judgment of the court below is acknowledged that the defendant led to the crime of this case, which led to the victim to commit the crime of this case by using a pipe and using a kitchen, which led to the victim to commit the crime of intimidation of this case, and that the defendant agreed with the victim, and that the defendant must take a prison term (two years of imprisonment) which has been suspended due to the invalidation of the existing suspended execution when imprisonment became final and conclusive as a result of the crime of this case, but the crime of this case is committed in this case, because the defendant injured the victim and threatened the victim with a kitchen knife, which is a dangerous object, and the nature of the crime is not easy. The defendant committed the crime of this case while the crime of this case was committed several times during the suspended execution period due to the same crime of this case, and there was a history of punishment for the same crime of this case, among the crimes of this case, the crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collective, deadly weapons, etc.) among the crimes of this case is a minimum statutory punishment for one year.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.