However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2017. 12. 9. 21:47 경 술을 마신 상태에서 B 포터 냉동탑차량을 운전하고 수원시 권선구 서 수원로 327 권선 2 사거리 앞 도로에 이르러 시동을 켠 채 운전석에서 잠이 들었고, 이를 목격한 제 3자의 112 신고로 출동한 수원 서부 경찰서 소속 경찰공무원 C로부터 술 냄새가 나고 눈이 충혈되고 얼굴에 홍조를 띄며 횡설수설하고 비틀거리며 걷는 등 술에 취한 상태에서 위 차량을 운전하였다고

For the reason that there are reasonable grounds to determine a person, the same day was refused without justifiable grounds even if the person was requested to take a drinking test on three occasions from 22:00 to 22:22 of the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Report on the situation of a driver driving and notification of the result of regulating drinking driving;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 148-2 of the Road Traffic Act, Articles 148-2 (1) 2 and 44 (2) of the same Act, the selection of punishment for a crime, and the selection of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;