However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a neighbor who resides in the same building as the victim C(54 years of age).

At around 00:30 on August 19, 2016, the Defendant: (a) laid the knife (32.5cm in total length, 11cm in length) in the Defendant’s house located on the 5th floor of the same building; (b) laid the knife (32.5cm in length, 11cm in length) into the 3rd floor; and (c) took the knife the knife in front of the victim; and (d) took the knife the knife in front of the victim; and (d) took the knife the victim’s body.

Accordingly, the defendant carried a knife, which is a dangerous thing, and threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. A report on investigation;

1. Records of seizure, the list of seizure, and evidence of seizure;

1. Application of photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act, Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act: (a) the Defendant and the victim had exercised physical force, such as making the Defendant satisfing sat, etc. while leaving the park as a parking problem; and (b) during that process, the Defendant, the disabled, committed the instant crime in order to resist the resistance; (c) the Defendant had been 15 times criminal records; and (d) the Defendant had a majority of violent fields, but most of them were punished by a fine; and (e) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, circumstances after the crime, etc.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.